Take a position on a controversial topic related to education.
Growing up close to two people who are considered "exceptional learner" I am very aware of the positives and negatives of inclusion.
My cousin is a joyful and happy 12 year old, with a learning disability. As far as education goes, she is about 4 years behind where she should be at her age. With her IEP, she is able to participate fully in a normal classroom, with very little help from aides. For her, full inclusion is a great option. She has been able to develop relationships with teacher and students throughout her schooling, and learn and progress as much as she is able.
On the other hand, a close family friend of ours is a 16 year old with sever Down syndrome. Sean has no vocal communication skills, and is just starting to learn signs for things he wants or needs. Clearly, inclusion would be a terrible option for him. Without intense, one-on-one attention he is unable to function at home, much less at school.
Overall, I think inclusion is a great option for high functioning exceptional learners, but it is very important that the idea of inclusion is breached on a case by case basis. If in an attempt to achieve the least restrictive environment a student is placed in a more mainstreamed classroom than he or she is able to function in, I see this a major problem of inclusion. Most importantly, I think it is important that people very close to the student being considered decide if full inclusion is right for that student.